Optimizing LLM Costs in Healthcare Applications: Practical Strategies

Large Language Models (LLMs) hold tremendous promise for healthcare — from enhancing patient support to better clinical insights. But as their use grows, so do operational costs. These models can be expensive to run, especially in production settings where high volume and complex medical data are the norm.

The good news? You can dramatically reduce LLM-related costs without sacrificing quality or compliance. Below, we explore smart strategies for controlling token usage, improving efficiency, and designing smarter AI systems — all tailored to the unique needs of healthcare applications.

Input Optimization: Trim the Fat, Keep the Context

We usually start here — with the input — because that’s where most LLM costs silently accumulate.

In healthcare, inputs are rarely short. You might need to feed the model long patient histories, system messages, or previous interactions. It adds up fast. And when you’re billed per token, every unnecessary word is literally money wasted.

So the goal is to preserve the context the model needs — and nothing more.

That means:

• Standardizing your prompts using healthcare-specific templates (e.g., "Patient Summary" formats that focus only on symptoms, diagnoses, and recent interactions)
  
• Summarizing past conversations instead of dumping full logs
  
• Stripping away metadata or irrelevant notes that don’t help the model reason
  
• Using embedding-based retrieval to surface only the most relevant prior interactions
  

It's not about blindly shrinking the input — it’s about being selective. And in clinical environments, that also helps improve performance: the model is less distracted and more focused on what matters.

The Output Dilemma: Say Less, But Say It Clearly

Here’s something many teams underestimate: output tokens always cost more than input tokens.

So even if you’ve streamlined the prompt, a verbose response can still eat into your budget — and frustrate users. In healthcare, a rambling LLM that over-explains symptoms or recommendations doesn’t just cost more — it creates risk and confusion.

That’s why output optimization matters just as much.

Start by being intentional with the model’s behavior:

• Prompt it to return structured summaries, not open-ended paragraphs
• Tune temperature settings for predictable, concise language
• Set max token limits to prevent the model from going off on tangents

And when possible, let the system do the work. If your backend can return medication details, let the model call a function instead of explaining it itself. If your app displays structured data (like care plans), ask the model for a JSON-formatted response rather than full prose.

The point isn’t to make the model dumber — it’s to make it deliberate.

The Repetition Trap: Don’t Pay Twice for the Same Thought

Here’s a simple truth in production: people ask the same things over and over.

Whether it’s “Can I take this medication with food?” or “What does this symptom mean?”, these repetitive queries cost you every time — unless you cache.

Caching isn’t just an engineering optimization. In LLM workflows, it’s a financial imperative.

That might mean:

• Storing and reusing model responses for identical or nearly identical prompts
• Using semantic search to detect similarity across queries
• Pre-generating answers to your top 100 user questions

Frameworks like Langchain or LlamaIndex can help you manage this efficiently. And in healthcare, where many interactions are templated or follow-up-based, caching has an especially high return on investment.

You’ve already paid to think through the answer. Why pay again?

The Architecture Question: Not Every Task Needs an LLM

One of the biggest mindset shifts in cost optimization is architectural. It’s this:

You don’t need an LLM for everything.

In fact, you probably shouldn’t use one for everything.

For many healthcare tasks — symptom triage, care plan logic, even form classification — smaller, deterministic models work better. They're faster, cheaper, and more explainable. Save the LLM for the heavy lifting: language generation, nuanced Q&A, summarization.

This hybrid model — rule-based systems or classifiers for structured tasks, LLMs for natural language — gives you tiered intelligence.

And that tiering is exactly what makes real-world AI applications scalable. You don’t pay GPT-4 prices to detect whether a fever is present. You use a decision tree. Then, if needed, you ask the LLM to explain what that fever might mean.

Smaller models also help mitigate hallucination risks, a real concern in clinical use. And when you architect with that tiering in mind from the start, it becomes much easier to scale usage without scaling cost linearly.

The Model Size Myth: Bigger Isn’t Always Smarter

There’s a common assumption that the biggest model will always give the best results.

In our experience, that’s not just wrong — it’s expensive.

Yes, models like GPT-4o or Claude Sonnet are incredibly powerful. But they’re also costly and slow. And in real-world healthcare apps, speed matters. So does efficiency. Especially when users are waiting, or when you're serving thousands of interactions a day.

Smaller models — GPT-4o-mini, Claude Haiku, open-source LLMs — can often perform just as well on narrow, well-defined tasks. They’re faster. They’re cheaper. And they may even outperform larger models if tuned properly for your specific use case.

So the smart move is to benchmark. Find the smallest model that meets your clinical or UX quality threshold. Then scale that.

Don’t pay for raw horsepower when a scooter gets you where you’re going just as well.

The Operational Layer: You Can’t Optimize What You Don’t Measure

All of these strategies only work if you can see what’s actually happening under the hood.

That means tracking:

• Token usage
• Latency
• Cache hit/miss rates
• Cost per session
• Output quality (either via human review or user satisfaction metrics)

Many LLM platforms now offer built-in observability tools — but for healthcare, you’ll want to pair those with compliance tracking. Especially if you’re dealing with PHI or regulated outputs.

The goal isn’t just optimization. It’s control. Knowing where your spend is going. Knowing where the model is overperforming or underperforming. And having the visibility to course-correct when needed.

Final Thoughts: Intelligence Is Only Useful If It’s Sustainable

If you’re serious about using LLMs in healthcare — not just as a prototype, but in real production — you have to treat cost as a first-class citizen.

That doesn’t mean cutting corners. It means designing smarter:

• Inputs that carry only the signal, not the noise
• Outputs that speak clearly and concisely
• Architectures that use the right tool for each job
• Models that are sized to the task, not the ego
• Systems that evolve based on what you see and measure

That’s what real optimization looks like. It’s not a one-time trick — it’s a mindset. And if we want AI to deliver on its promise in healthcare, we can’t just focus on what’s possible. We have to focus on what’s practical.

Because AI that can’t scale is just a demo.

But AI that’s designed to scale — smart, lean, and trustworthy — is what will define the next generation of digital health products.

{{lead-magnet}}